Smart Contract Development
  • Introduction
    • What is a Transaction
    • Accounts and Signing
    • What is a smart contract
  • Learning Solidity
    • Introduction
    • Module 1
      • Variable Types
      • Variable Scope: State & Local variables
      • Global variables
      • Functions
        • View and Pure
        • Shadowing in Fuctions
      • Mapping
      • Require
      • Events
    • Project #1: Simple Registry
    • Module 2
      • Constructor
      • Data Location: Value & Reference
      • Interface
      • Import
        • Importing in Foundry
      • Inheritance
      • ERC-20
      • Checks-effect-interaction pattern
    • Project #2: Basic Vault
    • Module 3
      • Payable
      • Receive
      • Fallback
      • Returns
    • Project #3: ERC20+ETH Wrapper
    • Module 4
      • Immutable and Constant
      • Fixed-point Math
      • Abstract contracts
      • ERC-4626
      • Modifier + Inheritance +Ownable
      • Type
    • Project #4: Fractional Wrapper
    • Module 5
      • If-else
      • Libraries
        • TransferHelper
      • Chainlink Oracle
    • Project #5: Collateralized Vault
  • Compendium
    • Solidity Basics
      • Variable Types
      • Value Types
        • address
        • enum
      • Reference Types
        • strings
        • mappings
        • struct
        • Arrays
        • Multi-Dimensional arrays
      • Global Objects
      • Functions
        • Function types
        • Constructor Function
        • Transaction vs Call
        • Require, Revert, Assert
      • Function signature + selectors
      • Payable
        • Payable + withdraw
        • msg.value & payable functions
      • Receive
      • Fallback function (sol v 0.8)
        • Fallback function (sol v 0.6)
      • call, staticcall, delegatecall
    • Return & Events
    • Control Variable Visibility
    • Local Variables (Storage v Memory)
    • Data Location and Assignment Behaviors
    • Modifiers & Inheritance & Import
      • import styles
    • Interface & Abstract Contracts
    • ABI & Debugging
    • Libraries
    • Conditional(ternary) operators
    • Smart Contract Life-cycle
      • Pausing Smart Contracts
      • Destroying Smart Contracts
    • Merkle Trie and MPT
    • Merkle Tree Airdrop
  • Try & catch
  • Ethereum Signatures
  • EVM, Storage, Opcodes
    • EVM
    • Wei, Ether, Gas
    • Storage
    • ByteCode and Opcodes
    • Transaction costs & Execution costs
  • Reading txn input data
  • Data Representation
  • Yul
    • Yul
      • Intro
      • Basic operations
      • Storage Slots
      • Storage of Arrays and Mappings
      • Memory Operations
      • Memory: how solidity uses memory
      • Memory: Return, Require, Tuples and Keccak256
      • Memory: Logs and Events
      • Inter-contract calls
      • calldata
      • free memory pointer
    • Yul Exercises
      • read state variable
      • read mapping
      • iterate Array, Return Sum
    • memory-safe
  • Upgradable Contracts
    • Upgradability & Proxies
    • UUPS Example
    • Minimal Proxy Example
    • TPP Example
    • 🚧Diamond
      • On Storage
  • Gas Opt
    • Block Limit
    • gasLimit & min cost
    • Solidity Optimiser
    • Memory v calldata
    • Memory caching vs direct storage vs pointers
    • < vs <=
    • reverting early
    • X && Y, ||
    • constant and immutable
    • caching sload into mload
    • Syntactic Sugar
    • using unchecked w/o require
    • Compact Strings
    • Calling a view function
    • Custom errors over require
    • usage of this.
      • multiple address(this)
  • ERCs & EIPs
    • ERC-20.sol
      • Core functions
      • transfer()
      • transferFrom()
      • TLDR transfer vs transferFrom
    • Landing
      • ERC721.sol
      • EIP-721
        • LooksRare
        • Page 1
      • ERC-1271
      • EIP-2981
      • ERC-165
      • EIP-1167: Minimal Proxy Contract
    • VRFConsumerBase
    • UniswapV2Library
  • Yield Mentorship 2022
    • Projects
      • #1 Simple Registry
      • #2 Basic Vault
      • #3 ERC20+ETH Wrapper
        • setFailTransferTrue
      • #4 Fractional Wrapper
      • #5 Collateralized Vault
        • Process
        • Vault.sol
        • Testing
        • Chainlink Oracles
        • Pricing + Decimal scaling
        • Refactor for Simplicity
      • #9 Flash Loan Vault
        • Implementing ERC3156
        • Full code for lender
        • Ex-rate calculation
    • State Inheritance Testing
    • Testing w/ Mocks
    • Yield Style Guide
    • Github Actions
    • TransferHelper.sol
    • math logic + internal fn
    • Interfaces: IERC20
  • Foundry
    • Overview
    • Importing Contracts
    • Testing
      • stdError.arithmeticError
      • assume vs bound
      • Traces
      • label & console2
      • std-storage
  • Smart Contract Security
    • Damn Vulnerable Defi
      • 1. Unstoppable
      • 2. Naive receiver
      • 3. Truster
      • 4. Side Entrance
      • 5. The Rewarder
      • 6. Selfie
      • 7. Compromised
      • 8. Puppet
      • 9. Puppet V2
      • 10 - Free Rider
    • Merkle Tree: shortened proof attack
  • Fixed-Point Math
    • AMM Math
  • Solidity Patterns
    • checks-effects-interactions pattern
    • Router // batch
    • claimDelegate: stack unique owners
    • claimDelegate: cache previous user
  • Array: dup/ascending check
  • Deployment
    • Behind the Scenes
    • Interacting with External Contracts
    • Logging, Events, Solidity, Bloom Filter
  • Misc
    • Mnemonic Phrases
    • Bidul Ideas
  • Archive
    • Brownie Framework
      • Brownie basics
        • storing wallets in .env
        • Deployment to ganache
        • Interacting with contract
        • Unit Testing
        • Testnet deployment
        • Interacting w/ deployed contract
        • Brownie console
      • Brownie Advanced
        • Dependencies: import contracts
        • helpful_scripts.py
        • verify and publish
        • Forking and Mocking
        • Mocking
        • Forking
      • Testing
      • Scripts Framework
        • deploy.py
        • get_accounts
        • deploy_mocks()
        • fund_with_<token>()
      • Brownie Networks
    • Brownie Projects
      • SharedWallet
        • Multiple Beneficiaries
        • Common Code Contract
        • Adding Events
        • Renounce Ownership
        • Separate Files
      • Supply Chain
        • ItemManager()
        • Adding Events
        • Adding unique address to each item
      • Lottery
      • Aave - Lending and Borrowing
        • Approve & Deposit
        • Borrow
      • NFT
      • Advanced Collectible
        • adv_deploy() + Testing
        • Create Metadata
        • Setting the TokenURI
    • node npm
    • Ganache
    • Truffle
    • Remix
    • Installing Env
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Valid example
  • Attack
  • Prevention
  1. Smart Contract Security

Merkle Tree: shortened proof attack

https://www.rareskills.io/post/merkle-tree-second-preimage-attack

Previous10 - Free RiderNextAMM Math

Last updated 1 year ago

The second preimage attack in Merkle trees can happen when an intermediate node in a merkle tree is presented as a leaf.

Valid example

  • we want to create a merkle proof for the leaf ℓ₂, in yellow text.

  • we will need all the hashes in green.

The proof to the root is

h(a) = h(h(ℓ₁) + h(ℓ₂))
h(e) = h(h(a) + h(b))
h(g) = h(h(e) + h(f))
return root == h(g)

Attack

What if the attacker provides an intermediate node as a leaf, along with the shortened proof?

Essentially, if a merkle proof is valid, then a shortened version of it is also valid if we pass the first value in the original proof as a leaf.

  • attacker provides a as the leaf, and the green hashes as the merkle proof

  • the merkle can be correctly generated from this truncated offering, and therefore verification will pass

Prevention

1. The attack requires 64 byte leaves

For this attack to work, the attacker must pass in the preimage of the intermediate node, not its hash value. This means it must pass a as the leaf, not hash(a). Since Solidity uses 32 byte hashes, a = h(ℓ₁) + h(ℓ₂) will be 64 bytes long.

  • If the contract does not accept 64 byte leaves as input, then the attack will not work.

  • That is, if the input to the leaf has a length other than 64 bytes, it is impossible to pass h(ℓ₁) + h(ℓ₂) as a false leaf value.

2. Using a different hash for the leaf as a defense

If our application need to accept 64 byte leaves for some reason, then we can prevent the attack by using a different hash for the leaves than for the proof.

  • That is, when the leaf is first hashed, we used a different hash than what we use for hashing to the root.

  • This will prevent the attacker from “reconstructing” an intermediate node as if it were a leaf. Using the diagram above, the attacker is using h(a) to create the false “leaf.” However, if leaves are passed through h’(a), then the intermediate value cannot be reconstructed.

OpenZeppelin uses a double hash as a "different hash"

We've used green underlines to show where the hash is taken twice to construct the leaf node from the underlying data.

The attack is easy to defend against — simply do not allow non-leaf values to be interpreted as leafs.

Instead of using a different hash function (such as via a ) which would cost more gas, Openzeppelin simply hashes the leaf twice. That is, h’(x) = h(h(x)).

precompile